Library Advocacy Blog

A collaboration between Louis Rosen, Sandra Furey, and Melissa Parker, three students in Dr. Slone's Foundations of Library Science class (LIS 5020) at the University of South Florida School of Library and Information Science, Spring 2006. Call them "L.A.B. Rats" if you wish, but they are the Library Advocacy Bloggers, and they're here to raise awareness of libraries and library issues!

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

A parting challenge from Dr. Slone

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Dr. Slone herself had something to add to finish out our big week here at the Library Advocacy Lounge. She has posed the following challenge to the entire class, and would like us all to weigh in with our own thoughts.

Advocacy Challenge

(Disclaimer: This is a made-up story based verrrry loosely on a real life situation. It is more fiction than fact.)

There once was an elementary school, called Oasis, located in a middle-class, culturally diverse neighborhood that was a "Mecca" for politically savvy, progressive people. The staff at the local library was heavily involved in activities at Oasis and the surrounding community.

One day, a new library needed to be built. The librarians at the branch near Oasis found an ideal spot and developed an initial plan. The plan began with putting together an advocacy group and attending an upcoming commissioners meeting.

At the meeting, when time came to discuss the relocation plan, the head of the county commission announced that the plan to build the library at the new site should be thrown out because Oasis was built on an earthquake fault and needed the spot. Attendees were invited to give their opinions about the developments.

To the librarians' dismay, most people wanted Oasis to stay where it was. They argued that the school was only 12 years old, and that their property values would go down if there was no school in the immediate vicinity.

The advocacy group did not wish to oppose the plans to rebuild Oasis. They felt that the school should have priority for the new spot; so, they set out to find another one. The site they found, however, would cost $67,000 more to buy. The city commissioners and Friends of the Library balked at the cost. The library board reminded the advocacy group that even if the library turned down the disputed spot, there was no guarantee that the school would be rebuilt there. The group was also informed that the issue was outside the realm of library advocacy. The group disagreed. They felt that, as part of the community, the library should not stand in the way of the safety of their patrons. They set the following priorities:

1). develop a new advocacy plan;
2). raise the money for the new site;
3). support and advocate for the rebuilding of Oasis on the coveted site.

Is this real library advocacy, or is the issue none of the librarian's business?

--Debra J. Slone, Assistant Professor

3 Comments:

  • At 12:49 PM, March 15, 2006, Blogger Heather said…

    While the efforts of the library advocacy group are noble and they are keeping the needs of the community in mind, I think they should step back and wait to see what happens. Even though libraries and schools are educational partners in the community, the advocacy group should not be part of the decision making process for the school. The site may indeed not work anyway. There should be alternative sites sought for both locations, not just one. Ultimately, I think it's up to the community, not one commissioner, or the library advocacy group, as to where the school and the library should reside.

     
  • At 11:30 PM, March 20, 2006, Blogger Lou said…

    Please forgive the lateness of my reply -- I've been a little stressed of late. I wonder if anyone else around here can relate. :)

    Anyway, I tend to agree with those who say the library advocacy group should wait, follow the progress, and see what happens before making a decisive move. In the meantime, they can and should be formulating contingency plans in case the site changes or something else falls through -- this often happens in real life. By holding back, they can save themselves possible negative publicity until the issue becomes a clear and present concern for sure, and possibly "swing into action" as heroes later on. However, they are all citizens of the community, and have to be prepared to make compromises on behalf of the greater good for the area.

     
  • At 1:24 PM, April 08, 2006, Blogger Meredith Myers said…

    I think they should scratch the whole thing and put up another Starbucks. Or better yet a Jamba Juice - those Matcha Green Tea Smoothies are the best!

    Seriously, since I live on the beach and see all the greedy developers tearing down historic sites and mom and pop businesses to build these over the top condos that all the rich people use one day out of the year, let's be realistic, nobody gives a crap about the school or the library.

    Hence where this library advocacy group comes in. They gotta be outspoken but at the same time silent. Most important, they have to speak in terms that people are gonna respond to, if they speak at all.

    Approach Starbucks about joining with the school and the library on that new property. We live in a time of brand marketing, people. The new Starbucks Oasis Library would be a hit!!

    With frappachinos, it's a win-win for everybody. Can you imagine how many books those kids could read after a Mocha? And the library clerks shelving books on Americanos? The teachers could even add a coffee cource so the kids could be prepared when they get jobs at Starbucks!

    Yes, we live in a society that is going straight to the cocoa bean...

     

Post a Comment

<< Home